I took a trip to Las Vegas, NV with my most recent and favorite employer. Las Vegas is a city that most people "need" to go to at least once in their lives, but I never felt this way. Beside the gambling, sex, drugs and rock & roll, Las Vegas represents mostly bad qualities to me such as waste and useless consumption. Since I am very happily married, and I'd never gamble (because I subscribe to probabilities), Las Vegas is somewhere that I would have never gone if my awesome employer wasn't footing the bill.
As long as there are low prices for the things that harm the environment the most, there will be little incentive for any agricultural industries to make any moves such as these. In my opinion, the incentive should be provided by the government (sadly, with some of our tax dollars).
Government programs have recently made some big steps in the right direction. I estimated that the "Cash for Clunkers" program removes between 5,700,000,000 and 4,950,000,000 pounds of CO2 per year. I've heard of a new program that is supposed to do the same thing for inefficient appliances.
The American diet is driven largely by the price of our food choices. Unfortunately for meat lovers, this will have an effect on their wallets -- very much like recent tobacco taxes, making the price for a pack of cigarettes double over the last few years.
My wife and I love our Prius very much. In 2003, we bought a 2nd generation Toyota Prius.
Now that we have driven our first 100,000 miles, I wanted to show the savings over this distance as well as how much environmental benefit it has made.
I guess that I've been a little bit inspired recently. I've watched a bunch of videos on YouTube that I should have seen a long time ago. They are videos that look at the global warming discussion from a risk management perspective. Greg Craven is a physics teacher, but he has made quite a few professional videos that are all on YouTube. The one that you have to see is called How It All Ends (embedded below). He reminds me a little bit of Bill Nye or Alton Brown (of the Food Network).
This is a little political aside.
For years, I've thought that people who call themselves "conservatives" do not really conserve resources or the overall environment, so why should they have this nice sounding title as their own? The other side of that is that there is a certain stigma associated with liberals.
Anyway, it is just my belief that we're all in this together (a socialist idea) but I think that the typical conservative would embrace a philosophy that is founded on conserving -- environmentalists are conservatives in a literal sense.
I've put together a list of the top 10 things you can do to save the planet. This list is purely opinion and subjective. The list is in order of greatest amount of change to least amount of change, in my opinion.
Today I watched the Climate Change Hearings at the House Energy & Commerce subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives about the exciting new climate legislation that is being debated.
I've been reading a lot of what others have been saying about the environment. I like to seek out both sides of an argument, sometimes I have to scroll down beyond 50 Google results before I find anything from the other side of the case, but this one particular bit of news really made me upset.
I recently watched the video of this Bible-quoting Republican from the U.S. House of Representatives. In the video, he concludes that God is in charge of any climate change and only God will decide when the end of the world will be. The guy's name is John Shimkus,
Ahhh .... you thought that I was talking about the driver or passengers being naked, but that's illegal in most states (if not all). The idea is to make your car naked, not you.
This video must have caused an emotional response in me when I was younger because I will never be able to forget it. The video shows how sad this Native American is upon viewing the land - with garbage all over the place. This really speaks to the underlying promise that "white man" made especially when seizing land from Chief Seattle's people -- that they would must take care of the land.